Pages

Monday, May 13, 2013

PRESENTING PAPER AT CIVERE: EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT STRUCTURES



ABSTRACT   :
                 After the devastating earthquakes in Killari (Maharashtra) on 30th sep 1993 and in Bhuj(Gujarat) on 26th January 2001, major concern is attracted towards earthquake resistively. In a developing nation like India commonly built structures are one to three storey RCC dwellings in rural areas, whereas in rural parts adobe and stone masonry construction is still a common practice. In such a scenario proposals of costlier constructions practices like ductile RCC or steel structures can find no place in affordable housing scheme. Therefore precast construction proved remedy to change over from adobe stone masonry to concrete construction. But the major disadvantage faced by precast products is its poor performance during earthquakes. The weakness is remedied in these proposals by amalgamation of two concepts in a new technique wherein combination of pre-cast structures and base isolation strategies is introduced.                       
                 Emphasis on theoretical and experimental studies of base isolated precast frames is necessary in such cases. Research work is required for feasibility , analytical and experimental studies for base iso latticed  precast structure before it can be implemented following are a few research guidelines ,
1)                        Different possible isolation systems for precast buildings can be collected and reviewed for technical merits and demerits constructability and versatility. Of  particular importance is development of seismic design recommendations in codes for base isolated precast structure.
2)                        Seismic response evaluation of base isolated precast structural system for various seismic zones and site characteristics will be required. The aims are to carry out dynamic. Based on this appropriate simplified design rules will be generalized
3)                        Economic studies are required to ascertain the cost effectiveness of proposed strategy.

                                           Earthquake Resistant   Structure
The conventional approach to earthquake resistant design of a building depends upon providing the building with the strength stiffness, and in elastic deformation capacity which is good enough to withstand a given level of an earthquake generated inertia forces. This is generally a accomplish through the selection of an appropriate structures configuration and the careful detailing of the structure member such as beam columns and shear walls and the connections between them and the adequate foundation for the structure.
Among the most important advance technique of earthquake resistance design and construction are
1.            Base isolation
2.            Energy dissipation devices
Base isolation:
                      In recent base isolation has become and increasingly applies structure design technique for building and Bridges in highly seismic areas. Many types of structure have been build using this approach and man y other and design phase or under construction. Most of the completed building and those under construction use rubber isolation bearing in some way in the isolation system. In India very first building using this technique will be hospital building, to be constructed in Bhuj. The idea behind the concept of base isolation is quite simple. There are two basics types of isolation system.
1)      Lead - rubber  bearing isolation system
2)      Spherical sliding isolation system

Lead – rubber Bearing isolation system:
1)      This method is widely used in recent years by use of elastomeric bearings.
2)      In this building is decoupled form horizontal component of earthquake by interposing a layer with low horizontal stiffness between structure of foundation.
3)      This layer gives the structure, a fundamental frequently that is much lower than its fixed base frequency.
4)      The isolation system does not absorb the earthquake energy but rather deflects it through dynamics of the system.
5)      A base isolated structure is supported lay a series of bearing pads. Placed between building and buildings foundation.
6)      The lead rubber bearing are among frequently used type of base isolation bearings. In this layers of rubbers are sandwiched together with layers of steel. In middle of the bearing is a solid lead “plug” on top and bottom bearing is fitted with steel plates which are used to attach bearing with building and foundation.    

 

7)      The bearing is very stiff and strong in vertical direction.
8)      Inertial forces, which the building undergoes are proportional to buildings acceleration during ground motion and it is being observed that during earthquake building acceleration of base isolated structure is reduce to 1\4 of the acceleration of fixed base building.
9)      Also lead plug damps the buildings vibration.

 

10)  The bearing is very stiff and strong in vertical direction.
11)  Inertial forces, which the building undergoes are proportional to buildings acceleration during ground motion and it is being observed that during earthquake building acceleration of base isolated structure is reduce to 1\4 of the acceleration of fixed base building.

Spherical sliding isolation system:-
1.      The building is supported by bearing pads that have a curved surface and low friction.
2.      Since curved surface the building slides both in horizontal and vertical direction.
3.      By adjusting the radius of bearing curved surface, it can be used to design bearings that lengthens the natural period and vibration of building
4.      Lower the friction, lower the shear transmitted.
5.      Also slider have no restoring force and so requirements for bearings sites may extremely large as displacement may be in any direction. It is possible to limit the displacement by adding restoring force.
6.      It can be done by elastomeric bearings, which centre the sliders, they also provide torsion and it the displacement become too layer, and it provide stiffening action.
7.      To stop movement of sliders, under wind and other non-critical lateral loads, it to provide a breakable link, “Mechanical base” It will provide a rigidly fixes structure under normal loading but would fracture under serve loading and allowing isolation to work.

Benefits :-
1)      Following an earthquake. A base isolated precast structure will require only normal inspection.
2)      Due to system’s simplicity and construct ability it will provide savings in number of man hours necessarily compare to construct a conventional moment resisting system.
3)      Provide major increase in safety seismic regions economically providing protection to occupants and owners.

Energy dissipation devices :-
1)      This system depends upon damping and energy dissipation.
2)      As it is known, a certain amount of vibration energy it transferred to building by earthquake. Building themselves processes an inherent ability to dissipate, this energy.
3)      This capacity of building to dissipate energy is quite limited.
4)      So lay equipping a building with additional devices, which have high damping capacity, we can decrease the seismic energy entering the building and thus decrease damage.
5)      The damping device can be categorized
a.       friction dampers : They utilize frictional dampers to dissipate energy
b.      Metallic dampers: They utilize of deformation of metal elements.
c.       Visco-elastic dampers: They utilize the forced movement of fluids within the dampers.
            If fluid viscous dampers are especially effective in minimizing forces acting on a building column. They reduce drifts, and shear forces without introducing axial column forces which are in phase with column bending moments. It helps to reduce drifts and shear forces of two to three in comparison to the response of model without dampers. Fluid viscous damping devices have been proved to be a reliable and affordable solution to seismic design problems.


The damping action is provided by the flow of fluid across the piston head. The piston head is made with a deliberate clearance between the inside of the cylinder and the outside of the piston head, which forms an annular orifice. The fluid flows through this orifice at high speed as the damper strokes. The shape of the piston head determines the damping characteristics. The force/velocity relationship for this kind of damper can be characterized as F=CV exp n, where F is the output force in pounds, V is the relative velocity across the damper in inches per second, C is a constant determined mainly by the damper diameter and the orifice area, and n is a constant exponent which can be any value from .30 to 1.95. The exact value for n depends upon the shape of the piston head. Values of n ranging from .3 to 1.0 seem to work best for structural applications. When the fluid viscous damper strokes in compression, fluid flows from Chamber 2 to Chamber 1. When the fluid viscous damper strokes in tension, fluid flows from Chamber 1 to Chamber 2. The high pressure drop across the annular orifice produces a pressure differential across the piston head, which creates the damping force.
                As the damping orifice is provided by the annular clearance between the piston head and the cylinder body, it is possible to provide inherent thermal compensation by making these two parts from different materials. By choosing materials with the correct thermal coefficients of expansion, it is possible to make the variation in the gap compensate for the variation in fluid properties as temperature changes. Through proper design techniques, variation in damping as small as plus or minus 15% over a temperature range of +20 degrees F to +120 degrees F can be obtained. Spherical bearings at each end of the fluid viscous damper permit the damper to angulate relative to the structure without binding. Figure shows a detail of these spherical end bearings. These bearings permit rotation in every direction, which prevents binding in the fluid viscous damper. In some cases there is enough flexibility in the structure to make it possible to solidly mount the dampers. A typical installation of this type is shown in Figure                       
                                 

                              
                                         SPHERICAL BEARING
Figure shows a typical mounting bracket for fluid viscous dampers. This bracket consists of a female clevis mounted to a base plate which in turn welds to the structure. Upon installation the dampers simply slide into the clevises. Once the dampers are in the clevises, insertion of the pins holds them in position. Cotter keys then secure the pins in place. The dampers are always made with enough extra strokes to account for variance in the hole-to-hole distance in the structure. 
                                                   
                                      MOUNTING BRACKET

Fluid viscous dampers can be designed into both new buildings and existing structures. As they are relatively small and inconspicuous, they can be incorporated into a structure without compromising its appearance. This is especially useful in the refurbishment of historically significant buildings. They can also be added without significant structural modification in most cases. Fluid viscous dampers can be installed as diagonal members in several ways, or can tie into chevron braces. They can also be used as the two elements of a chevron brace.  Typical fluid damper installations.
                         

Figure shows the incorporation of a fluid viscous damper into the diagonal element connecting a beam-column joint at one level of a moment frame structure to the adjacent beam-column joint at the next level. Connections of this nature can be designed into a new structure, or could be added to an existing structure. This was done in the case of the Stockton City Hall refurbishment, described later in this paper.
                    

Figure shows a detail of this configuration. It is also possible to use a modification of the chevron brace, in which both bracing beams contain fluid dampers. In this case both beams connect to the structure at both ends with spherical bearings and mounting brackets. In this case one end of the damper has a spherical bearing and the other end has a flange that attaches rigidly to the diagonal beam.
      
  FLUID VISCOUS DAMPING IN COMPARISON TO BASE ISOLATION:
Both fluid viscous damping and base isolation have the same objective of significantly decreasing the response of a structure to earthquake excitation. With both fluid viscous damping and base isolation it is possible to have a structure remain within the elastic region, so there is no permanent deformation from a seismic event. Although the objectives are the same, the two techniques differ greatly in their implementation.
          
 CASE STUDY: STOCKTON CITY HALL:
A study of possible methods of refurbishment of the Stockton City Hall considered base isolation, fluid viscous damping and conventional stiffening. The main purpose of this study was to estimate the costs of each type of rework. It was found that conventional stiffening and the addition of fluid viscous dampers had about the same cost, while base isolation cost around 40% more. It was also found that overall life cycle cost was much less with fluid viscous dampers, as they permitted the structure to remain linearly elastic. This eliminated the need for major structural repairs after a significant seismic event. The Stockton City Hall is a 102 ft. x 170 ft. three story non-ductile concrete frame building with brick infill. It was built in 1926. Analysis indicated the need for the following linear fluid viscous dampers in the North-South direction:
          
                  CAPACITY VELOCITY LOCATION QUANTITY:

The total force levels required from the dampers in the East-West direction are the same. The number and size of the dampers were changed to accommodate architectural constraints. This particular installation used the split diagonal damper configuration.

CONCLUSIONS:
Hence we have seen different innovations used in earthquake engineering such as fluid viscous dampers and base isolation technique. We have also compared fluid viscous dampers and base isolation technique. Fluid viscous dampers can be added to either a new or an existing structure to greatly improve structural performance during a seismic event. They offer an attractive alternative to base isolation in terms of cost and ease of installation. The base isolation system is more safety and economical. The theme of planning new economic seismic devices is crucial to apply to modern techniques of seismic protection with base isolation to the wide field of small building.

BIBLIOGRAPHY:
· www.ecs.csun.edu
· www.boomenviro.com
· www.civil.columbia.edu
· www.innovations-report.com/html
·         FEMA 356 (2000), “ Prestandard and Commentary for the seismic Rehabilitation of               buildings “’ American Society of Civil Engineers, USA

No comments:

Post a Comment