|
ABSTRACT
A soft Hand-off Algorithm for
cellular mobile system is investigated in this paper. Since there can be only
one carrier frequency being used in CDMA System, a handoff scheme with
diversity, a so called “Soft Handoff”, was proposed for higher communication
quality and capacity. During the studies on Hand-off algorithm, it was felt
that the Hand-off procedure had to be evaluated for such system. To understand the Soft Handoff, A simulation
model, result reveals that for higher traffic blocking and drop out probability
increases with respective traffic but the hand-off probability decreases with
respective traffic. Hence to improve the performance of it is suggested that
F1/F2 Scheme should be used. By allotting different frequency in the adjacent
cell i.e. Eb/It will be very much less in the system.
1.INTRODUCTION
The
3G of Cellular Mobile Network promises to provide vide variety of services such
as voice, Data & Multimedia to users on the move. Mobile customers can make
a phone call as in wireless telephone, to make a connection
to retrieve information message such as E-mail or Stock information or to make
a connection to surf the internet or to do business over the internet. Due to
the Cellular nature of mobile communication these networks have been modeled
using queuing networks, a cell is modeled as a queue and channels as servers
with limited number of channels representing the capacity restrictions on the
number of customers in the queue. The Handoff concept in the cellular mobile
communication is modeled as customers routing from one queue to another. The
major difference between mobile network and queuing network is that in cellular
communication network the requesting call holding time of call is related to
call. Whereas the service time of customers in queuing network is related to
the queue. Each bay station is responsible for providing service to mobile
users in its area, called a cell. Within each cell, there are usually two
classes of call traffic : New calls and Handoff calls. A New call is one which
initiates the current cell, while a handoff call is the one which initiates in
the another cell, and handed over to the current cell. When a new calls
originates in the current cell, if an unused channel is available. It will be
assigned for the communication between the mobile user and the bay station and
the new call is accepted for services. If no channel can be assigned to the new
call, which depends on the channel allocation scheme. The new may be blocked
and may be cleared from the system and in this case the actual connection time
for this call is Zero. If a new call is blocked in one cell, this does not mean
that the new call is blocked in the network.
Recently,
CDMA has become a most promising technology for the future cellular network,
due to its various advantages. Because there can be only one frequency being
used in CDMA system, a handoff scheme with diversity, a so called “Soft
Handoff”, is proposed for higher communication quality. I brief a handoff
process in which the mobile unit can commence communication with a target bay
station without interrupting the communication with the current serving base
station is called “Soft Handoff”, i.e. “make before break”. The traditional
handoff scheme which requires the mobile unit to break the communication with
the current base station before establishing a new communication with the
target base station is called “Hard Handoff”, i.e. “break before make”. The handoff region of the hard handoff scheme
is in general, very narrow. This causes frequent hard handoffs i.e. frequent
communication breaks, a so called “Ping Pong Effect” when a mobile unit drives
in and out of the cells boundary. This also introduces larger interference to
other users. In soft handoff, since the procedure is “make before break”, no
matter how frequently mobile unit drives in and out of the handoff region
communication “breaks” Seldomly occur. Moreover the adoption of diversity
reception in soft handoff also leads to a better communication quality without
as large a transmitting power as that
required in hard handoff to maintain the broader handoff region. In other
words, by using the soft handoff scheme and a proper power control strategy as
proposed in IS-95, the require transmitter powers as well as interference can
be reduced to improve the communication quality and system capacity. Further
more, larger handoff regions of soft handoff also introduces a longer mean
queuing time to get a new channel from the target base station. In this paper
handoff procedure without queue is presented.
2.PROBLEM
FORMULATION:
In the
simulation model we assume that one mobile unit carries one call only. It means
that there is no bulk handoff arrival. We only consider that there are at most
two different sources in diversity reception. It cell will reserve Ch
channels out of a total of C available channels exclusively for handoff calls,
a so called cut off priority, because a suddenly forced termination during a
call session will be more upsetting than a failure to connect every handoff
requirement is assumed to be perfectly detected in our simulation model and
assignment of channel is instantaneous if channel is available.
The handoff mechanism is to be
based on Eb/It, which is computed on basis of signal strength. To compute the
signal strength of the mobile we use an Eight ray model.
Theoretically
the CDMA is a infinite capacity system, but in practice it is interference
limited, hence number of users served by a cell at a cell at a single time is
used to be 64 maximum for simulation purpose. We assume the call arrival
‘Poisson’s Process’ with mean call arrival. Call holding time is assumed to be
180 sec.
3. FLOW CHART
Fig. 2. Call Initialization Fig.3. Updating call parameters and hand off
PARAMETERS
|
VALUE
|
Specific Eb/It
ratio
(Eb/It)sp
|
5
|
Data rate
(BPS)
|
9600
|
Band width of
CDMA channel (MCPS)
|
1.23 x 106
|
Voice activity
factor (VF)
|
0.5
|
Hysterisis for
Handoff
|
2
|
Lower
Threshold (LT)
|
-82
|
Call departure
rate (l)
|
10
|
Mean call
holding time (Sec)
|
180
|
Radius of the
cell in meter (R)
|
1000
|
Number of
calls (RN)
|
10000
|
Max. Velocity
in m/sec (Vmax)
|
2
|
Table 1: Simulation Conditions

Where: C-no. of trunked channel offered by a trunked
radio system.
A- total offered traffic.
- Au =lH
Where : H-average duration of call.
l
- the average no. of call requests per unit time for each user.
Fig. 4.Variation of blocking Probability
Fig. 5.Variation of Handoff Probability
Fig. 6.Variation of dropout Probability .
4.Result
and discussion
From the
simulation module for the traffic 1 to 2 Erlang.fig.4 shows blocking
probability vs traffic. Here we observed that the blocking probability always
increases linearly with respect to traffic. With reference to handoff this
simulation result shown in fig.5 indicate that the hand off probability
decreases with respect to traffic.
This is because of the no of
calls generated are denied the service. Fig.6 shows the dropout probability for
the handoff algorithm for lower traffic the dropout probability negligibly
small, where as higher traffic the dropout probability is large. This shows
that for higher traffic the blocking and dropout probability increases. Hence
to improve the performance it is suggested that the f1/f2 scheme should be
used.
5.Conclusion
From the
simulation result we observed that the reused ratio of 1 the blocking
probability and dropout probability is high but this performance can be
improved by allotting different frequency in the adjacent cell i.e. Eb/It will
be very much less in the system.
6.References
- Fumihiro Urasawa, ken-ichi itoh, and laien-shang,’’Analysis and simulation result of multihof handoff scheme in an Ad- Hoc wireless network,’’ in IEEE Trans. Vol.8, PP. 1366-1369, 2002.
- N.zhang and J. Holtzman,‘’Analysis of handoff algorithm using both absolute and relative measurement’’, in IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol, vol.45, no.1,PP.174-179, 1996,2.
- Wei Li, Yuguang fang and Robert R, “ Actual call connection time characterization for wireless mobile network under a general channel allocation scheme”, in IEEE, Trans., Vol.1, no.4, PP.682-691, Oct.2003.
No comments:
Post a Comment